# Documentation testing

The primary way of documenting a Rust project is through annotating the source
code. Documentation comments are written in [markdown] and support code
blocks in them. Rust takes care about correctness, so these code blocks are
compiled and used as tests.

```rust,ignore
/// First line is a short summary describing function.
///
/// The next lines present detailed documentation. Code blocks start with
/// triple backquotes and have implicit `fn main()` inside
/// and `extern crate <cratename>`. Assume we're testing `doccomments` crate:
///
/// ```
/// let result = doccomments::add(2, 3);
/// assert_eq!(result, 5);
/// ```
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
    a + b
}

/// Usually doc comments may include sections "Examples", "Panics" and "Failures".
///
/// The next function divides two numbers.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// let result = doccomments::div(10, 2);
/// assert_eq!(result, 5);
/// ```
///
/// # Panics
///
/// The function panics if the second argument is zero.
///
/// ```rust,should_panic
/// // panics on division by zero
/// doccomments::div(10, 0);
/// ```
pub fn div(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
    if b == 0 {
        panic!("Divide-by-zero error");
    }

    a / b
}
```

Tests can be run with `cargo test`:

```shell
$ cargo test
running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out

   Doc-tests doccomments

running 3 tests
test src/lib.rs - add (line 7) ... ok
test src/lib.rs - div (line 21) ... ok
test src/lib.rs - div (line 31) ... ok

test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
```

## Motivation behind documentation tests

The main purpose of documentation tests is to serve as examples that exercise
the functionality, which is one of the most important
[guidelines][question-instead-of-unwrap]. It allows using examples from docs as
complete code snippets. But using `?` makes compilation fail since `main`
returns `unit`. The ability to hide some source lines from documentation comes
to the rescue: one may write `fn try_main() -> Result<(), ErrorType>`, hide it and
`unwrap` it in hidden `main`. Sounds complicated? Here's an example:

```rust,ignore
/// Using hidden `try_main` in doc tests.
///
/// ```
/// # // hidden lines start with `#` symbol, but they're still compileable!
/// # fn try_main() -> Result<(), String> { // line that wraps the body shown in doc
/// let res = try::try_div(10, 2)?;
/// # Ok(()) // returning from try_main
/// # }
/// # fn main() { // starting main that'll unwrap()
/// #    try_main().unwrap(); // calling try_main and unwrapping
/// #                         // so that test will panic in case of error
/// # }
/// ```
pub fn try_div(a: i32, b: i32) -> Result<i32, String> {
    if b == 0 {
        Err(String::from("Divide-by-zero"))
    } else {
        Ok(a / b)
    }
}
```

## See Also

* [RFC505][RFC505] on documentation style
* [API Guidelines][doc-nursery] on documentation guidelines

[doc-nursery]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/api-guidelines/documentation.html
[markdown]: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[RFC505]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0505-api-comment-conventions.md
[question-instead-of-unwrap]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/api-guidelines/documentation.html#examples-use--not-try-not-unwrap-c-question-mark
